In the complex landscape of international relations, sanctions have emerged as a primary tool for governments to exert pressure and influence over targeted entities or regimes. These measures, typically imposed in response to actions deemed contrary to international norms or security interests, encompass a wide range of restrictions, including financial sanctions targeting specific banks or financial institutions. While the intention behind such sanctions is often noble – seeking to deter illicit activities or disrupt funding to rogue nations – their implementation can have unintended consequences, particularly for innocent individuals caught in the crossfire of regulatory actions.
Recent years have witnessed a significant escalation in the use of sanctions, with an increasing number of foreign banks rightly finding themselves subjected to punitive measures. As these sanctions result in the freezing of transactions involving targeted banks, the unfortunate reality is that innocent customers who hold accounts with these institutions are often collateral damage. These individuals, law-abiding citizens with no connections to sanctioned entities or regimes, suddenly find themselves unable to carry out routine financial transactions, such as transferring funds abroad which can be particularly problematic for those holding bank accounts in multiple countries or needing to make urgent payments abroad for even basic necessities.
Whilst transfers of funds to UK accounts from sanctioned banks, even from accounts of innocent individuals is quite rightly impossible, the practical implementation of the regime has resulted in UK banks acting as correspondents for onward transactions to jurisdictions where inter-bank transfers are not prohibited, treating these transactions in the same way as UK bound transactions. The crux of the issue thus lies in the enforcement actions to comply with sanctions regulations. In their efforts to ensure strict adherence to these regulations, correspondent banks may overreach, freezing transactions even when they involve innocent customers of sanctioned banks. This overzealous enforcement has led to a myriad of challenges for affected individuals, including prolonged freezes on their funds, bureaucratic hurdles which seem impossible to overcome in resolving the issue, and significant disruptions to their financial and personal lives.
While a robust implementation of the sanctions regime is necessary to uphold international norms and deter illicit activities, there exists a fundamental misunderstanding in the application of these measures. Specifically, when a customer of a sanctioned bank conducts transactions with a non-sanctioned entity in another jurisdiction (whose sanctions regime does not prohibit this transaction), such as transferring funds to their own bank account in a bank in that jurisdiction, UK correspondent banks lack the legal authority to freeze the funds. This principle is underscored by the guidance provided by the Office of Sanctions Implementation (OFSI), which clearly stipulates that funds belonging to innocent individuals in such transactions where a UK bank acts as a correspondent should not be subjected to freezing unless directly linked to sanctioned entities or activities.
Despite the clarity of OFSI’s guidance, the misapplication of these principles by UK correspondent banks has led to the unjustified freezing of funds belonging to innocent individuals. This has resulted in widespread hardship, with affected individuals facing financial uncertainty, inability to meet obligations, and prolonged distress.
At IMD Corporate, we have encountered numerous cases where innocent individuals have been wrongly affected by sanctions enforcement actions. Leveraging our expertise and experience in navigating the complexities of financial regulations, we have successfully secured the release of frozen funds on behalf of our clients. By employing a combination of legal advocacy, developing our own strategy on dealing with such cases, and diligent follow-up evolving our strategy, we have been able to restore financial stability and peace of mind to those impacted by overzealous enforcement actions.
However, resolving these issues requires more than just reactive measures. It necessitates a proactive approach to address the root causes of misinterpretation and misapplication of sanctions regulations. Education and awareness initiatives aimed at correspondent banks and financial institutions can help clarify the proper procedures for handling transactions involving customers of sanctioned banks. Additionally, improved communication channels between regulatory authorities, such as OFSI, and financial institutions can facilitate better guidance and support in navigating sanctions compliance. It is however unlikely that these channels will develop naturally and until then those caught in the cross-fire will need advice and support to ensure that their funds are returned to them posthaste.
It is therefore essential for individuals facing frozen funds to understand their rights and options in seeking resolution. Seeking timely and accurate legal advice is crucial in navigating the complexities of sanctions enforcement and securing the release of frozen funds. While applying for an OFSI sanctions license may seem like a viable option, it is important to weigh the costs and benefits, as well as explore alternative avenues for resolution. Indeed, most OFSI licences are rejected and where there is no need for the OFSI licence, the application is almost guaranteed to be rejected. Where insufficient thought has been given at the outset, one can find themselves tens of thousands of pounds out of pocket at the state of the rejection of the OFSI licence which can be particularly disheartening when this may not have been the correct route to take in the first place.
In conclusion, while the implementation of sanctions is a necessary tool in the realm of international diplomacy and security, it is imperative to ensure that innocent individuals are not unduly harmed in the process. By addressing the inherent misunderstandings and challenges in enforcement actions, we can strive to uphold principles of justice, fairness, and accountability in financial regulations. If you are a customer of a sanctioned bank and your fund have been frozen by a UK correspondent bank do not hesitate to reach out for assistance. IMD Corporate stands ready to provide guidance and support in navigating these challenging circumstances and securing the release of wrongly frozen funds. Together, we can work towards a more equitable and just implementation of sanctions, ensuring the protection of innocent consumers amidst enforcement actions.
This article is for general information only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. Please note that the law may have changed since this article was published.
Talk to us today 
0330 107 0106
CONTACT US TODAY